Robert F Kennedy Jr has already stirred up a firestorm of backlash having suggested recently that autism is caused by vaccines. Kennedy’s autism advocacy Since joining the Trump administration, Kennedy has spoken often about autism. He has regularly advanced widely debunked theories alleging a direct causal relationship between vaccines and the developmental disorder. Even the experts who agree with his central prediction think his would-be blockbuster report misleads. Consequently, people on the autism spectrum and advocacy groups have blisteringly condemned him.
Once commonly seen only as a developmental disorder, autism—first diagnosed in 1978—is now understood to be a spectrum disorder. This is because symptoms and support needs differ significantly from one individual to the next. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), autism diagnoses have increased sharply since 2000, reflecting a growing awareness of the disorder rather than a true rise in prevalence.
This wildly popular belief is based on Kennedy’s claim that “autism comes from vaccines” on a now discredited study by Andrew Wakefield published in 1998. The Lancet medical journal withdrew this study from publication after revealing ethical violations and scientific errors. Despite this, Kennedy continues to promote the unfounded theory, claiming that autistic individuals will “never pay taxes, they’ll never hold a job, they’ll never play baseball, they’ll never write a poem, they’ll never go on a date,” alarming many in the community.
As anthropologist and expert in the field Dr. Manish Arora reported, Kennedy’s pronouncements should cause grave concern. He noted that such comments can be “very hurtful for families and autistic individuals.” Arora emphasized the importance of aligning conversations about autism with the most current science. She emphasized the need to present and preserve the lived experience of people with autism.
In response to Kennedy’s comments, Emily May, a mother of a child with autism, highlighted that advocacy groups often focus on acceptance and inclusion but may shy away from confronting “uncomfortable truths about children like mine.” Yet her sentiments speak to a larger fear that reductive narratives about autism may do a disservice to the multi-faceted nature of the condition.
Dani Bowman, a star of the reality TV show “Love on the Spectrum,” expressed her opposition to Kennedy’s comments. She was blunt in making her point. She stated, “Wanting to cure autism implies that our way of being is wrong and it isn’t.” Bowman’s view gives voice to what we know many people in the autism community believe. They see their identity as equally valid and worthy of respect.
James B Jones, another participant from “Love on the Spectrum,” characterized Kennedy’s comments as “extremely ignorant, and to be perfectly frank, downright offensive.” His statement supports what many advocates have long expressed—that harmful representations of autism in the media contribute to stigma.
Jake Tilk has shared his experiences with his younger brother Max, who is on the autism spectrum, through social media. Yet Hahn advocates for portraying autism in a more truthful way. He stated, “It’s most important that discussions about autism are grounded in science, compassion and most importantly the living experiences of people with autism themselves.”
Kennedy has committed to launching a new massive testing and research effort. So he has set out to investigate the cause of autism over the next five months. Many experts fear that his approach may continue to spread misinformation rather than foster genuine understanding or support for those on the spectrum.
Autism Speaks, an advocacy organization, acknowledged that Kennedy’s comments resonate with some individuals’ lived experiences but stressed that discussions about autism should reflect current science. They noted that “it should reflect current science and honor the lived experiences of autistic people, many of whom lead fulfilling lives and make invaluable contributions to their families, workplaces and communities.”
The reaction to Kennedy’s statement reflects an increasing desire for more complex discussions about autism. Advocacy groups and community members across the country are requesting conversations that are not predicated on fear, distrust or miscommunication, but instead driven by mutual respect and understanding.
Leave a Reply